Comparison of Predicted Obstacle Prediction for ALPO Type Catamaran Transport Vehicle Perbandingan Hasil Prediksi Hambatan Wahana Angkut ALPO Tipe Catamaran

Main Article Content

Wibowo Harso Nugroho
Abdul Kadir
Nanang JH Purnomo
M. Syaiful
Ahmad Yasim

Abstract

With the increase of the Decommisioning Offshore Platform in Indonesia water, a decommisioning vehicle is needed to dismantle and transport the offshore platform. Because of the operation of this vehicle to disassemble offshore platform in various offshore platform locations in Indonesian water, it is necessary to consider the vehicle main engine power by predicting the ship resistance when traveling to the offshore platform location. This paper discusses the results of several numerical prediction methods of resistance that applied on the catamaran ship type. The prediction method used for resistance calculation which based on satistical data and analytical methods from the cylindrical body theory. The resistance prediction on the decommisioning vehicles using maxsurf resistance with various methods at 12 knots service speed shows that Holtrop method produces a resistance value of 250.7 kN, the Van Oortmerssen method produces a resistance value of 955 kN, the Series60 method produces a resistance value of 210.5 kN, the Compton method produces a resistance value of 295.8 kN, the Fung method produces a resistance value of 540.6 kN, method Slender body produces a resistance value of 7036.4 kN, the Wyman method produces a resistance value of 603.2 kN and finally the last method of KR Barge produces a resistance value of 1258.5 kN. This study show that the differences of the result are significant from each of the prediction methods so that testing of the hydrodynamic model is highly recommended.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Wibowo Harso Nugroho, Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi

Pusat Teknologi Rekayasa Industri Maritim

References

[1] A. Arifin, W. H. Nugroho, and S. Sahlan, “Kajian Stabilitas Wahana Angkut ALPO sebagai Fungsi Kapasitas Tangki Ballast,” Jurnal Penelitian Enjiniring, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 155–165, 2018. [Online]. Available: 10.25042/jpe.112018.08; https://dx.doi.org/10.25042/jpe.112018.08
[2] K. Hans, M. Lu¨tzen, and Technical University of Denmark; the University of Southern Denmark, “Prediction of Resistance and Propulsion Power of Ships,” 2013.
[3] D. B. Purwanto, A. Sulisetyono, and T. Putranto, “Stability Analysis of Catamaran Passenger Vessel with Solar Cell Energy in Calm Water,” IPTEK The Journal for Technology and Science, vol. 28, no. 3, 2017. [Online]. Available: 10.12962/j20882033.v28i3.3222; https://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j20882033.v28i3.3222
[4] R. H. Akers, “Structural Load Prediction for High-Speed Planing Craft,” in SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE- 471, 2015.
[5] K. R. of Shipping, “Rules for the Towing Survey of Barges and Tugboats,” and others, Ed. Korean Register, 2010.
[6] B. Systems, “Maxsurf Resistance Windows Version 20 User Manual,” and others, Ed. Bentley Systems, 2014.
[7] A. Jamaluddin, et.al, “Wave Pattern dan Interaksi Hambatan Gelombang pada Kapal Lambung Ganda (Twin Hull) Kajian Analisa Numerik,” Jurnal Wave, UPT. BPPH - BPPT, vol. 4, no. 1, 2010.