Evaluation of the Design for the Construction of a 100 kW Micro Hydropower Plant (PLTMH) Utilizing Condenser Cooling Water Discharge at a 2×25 MW Coal-Fired Power Plant (CFPP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/r.e.m.v11i1.1814Keywords:
Microhydro, renewable energy, efficiency energy, economic, Coal-fired Power PlantAbstract
The utilization of residual energy within existing power plant systems represents a promising pathway to enhance energy efficiency and support decarbonization without requiring additional fuel consumption. This study evaluates the feasibility of integrating a micro-hydropower (MHP) system into the condenser cooling water discharge of a coal-fired power plant (CFPP) in Indonesia. A quantitative techno-economic assessment framework is employed, incorporating hydraulic analysis, annual energy production estimation, discounted cash flow (DCF) evaluation, environmental impact assessment, and sensitivity analysis. The results indicate that an average discharge of 1.20 m³/s and an effective head of 8.73 m can generate an actual power output of 77.37 kW, corresponding to an annual electricity production of 610.01 MWh. Economic evaluation shows strong feasibility, with a Net Present Value (NPV) of approximately IDR 3.9–4.0 billion, an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of about 27%, a Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of approximately IDR 725/kWh, and a payback period of 3.6 years. Sensitivity analysis reveals that capacity factor and discount rate are the most influential parameters affecting LCOE and NPV, respectively, while the system remains financially robust under ±10% variations. From an environmental perspective, the system can reduce carbon emissions by approximately 518 tons CO₂ per year without additional fuel consumption. Compared to conventional river-based micro-hydropower systems, the proposed approach offers higher operational stability, lower resource dependency, and reduced investment risk due to the utilization of continuous industrial flow and existing infrastructure. Overall, the findings demonstrate that integrating micro-hydropower into condenser cooling systems is a technically feasible, economically competitive, and low-risk strategy for improving energy efficiency and supporting incremental decarbonization in thermal power plants. The study contributes to the advancement of infrastructure-based energy recovery approaches and provides a practical framework for industrial-scale implementation.
References
[1] International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook 2023. Paris, France: IEA, 2023.
[2] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IRENA, 2024.
[3] G. Gatti, F. Iannuzzi, and L. Ciucci, “Economic assessment methodologies for distributed renewable energy systems,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13143679.
[4] European Small Hydropower Association (ESHA), Guide on How to Develop a Small Hydropower Plant. Brussels, Belgium: ESHA, 2021.
[5] S. Quoilin, M. Van Den Broek, S. Declaye, P. Deyewallef, and V. Lemort, “Waste heat recovery technologies and applications,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 87, pp. 109–121, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.082.
[6] M. S. Kumar and R. P. Saini, “Techno-economic feasibility analysis of small hydropower projects,” Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 54, pp. 42–50, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2019.12.001.
[7] H. J. Wagner and J. Mathur, Introduction to Hydro Energy Systems: Basics, Technology and Operation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020.
[8] A. Hasan, M. A. Al-Sulaiman, and I. Dincer, “Waste energy recovery technologies in industrial` systems: A comprehensive review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 150, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111429.
[9] J. L. Sawin et al., “Advancing system efficiency for energy transition pathways,” Energy Policy, vol. 158, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112556
[10] L. Kosnik and A. Steinschneider, “Small hydropower modernization and sustainable integration in existing infrastructure,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, 2022, pp. 1123–1135, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.065.
[11] M. Shafiei and A. R. Riahy, “Comprehensive techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of distributed renewable energy systems,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 52, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102143.
[12] Y. Zhang, H. Li, and P. Mancarella, “Integrated energy system optimization for industrial decarbonization,” Applied Energy, vol. 335, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120732.
[13] Ali, H. Hadiyanto, and A. Y. Wardaya, “Performance Analysis and Techno-Economic Evaluation of Solar Energy Retrofitting for Coal-Fired Power Plant in Central Kalimantan Province”, jsesd, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 138–150, Aug. 2024.
[14] O. Paish, “Small hydro power: Technology and current status,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 537–556, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.08.015.
[15] A. Kumar, K. Schei, A. Ahenkorah, R. Caceres Rodriguez, J. Devernay, M. Freitas, D. Hall, Å. Killingtveit, and Z. Liu, “Hydropower,” in IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 437–496.
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khoeruz zaman, Jaka Windarta, Sulistyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
