A Mapping Research on Cofiring from 1979 - 2022: Bibliometric Analysis
Article Sidebar
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published:
Apr 1, 2023
Keywords:
Bibliometric, Scientometric, Trend Research, Cofiring, Biblioshiny
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to investigate cofiring-themed articles through Bibliometric analysis using Biblioshiny. The metadata comes from the Scopus database, obtained using the keyword "cofiring". Nine hundred twenty-nine documents were obtained over 44 years (1979 – 2022). The study results show that the USA and China are hosts for cofiring researchers. The most relevant author and affiliate is from China, namely Longtu Li from Tsinghua University. The USA is the largest reference country for cofiring research. Cofiring research trends are divided into two clusters: the energy and power generation research cluster and the chemistry and ceramic materials research cluster. In energy and power generation research, three research themes relevant to current and future conditions are related to coal, biomass, and emission. The results of this study provide a comprehensive picture to academics in the fields of energy, power generation, chemistry, and materials science.
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Farras Ilham , Muchammad, Marcelinus Christwardana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
[1] Y. Xu, K. Yang, J. Zhou, and G. Zhao, “Coal-biomass co-firing power generation technology: Current status, challenges and policy implications,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 9, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12093692.
[2] P. Križan et al., “Briquetting of municipal solid waste by different technologies in order to evaluate its quality and properties,” Agronomy Research, vol. 9, no. SPPL. ISS. 1, pp. 115–123, 2011.
[3] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J Bus Res, vol. 133, no. March, pp. 285–296, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
[4] H. Chen and Y. S. Ho, “Highly cited articles in biomass research: A bibliometric analysis,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 12–20, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.060.
[5] C. Cicea, C. Marinescu, C. F. Albu, and D. P. Bălan, “Applying bibliometric mapping and clustering on research regarding biomass related innovation,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, 2019, no. April, pp. 2404–2419.
[6] A. Sertolli, Z. Gabnai, P. Lengyel, and A. Bai, “Biomass Potential and Utilization in Worldwide Research Trends—A Bibliometric Analysis,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095515.
[7] M. A. Perea-Moreno, E. Samerón-Manzano, and A. J. Perea-Moreno, “Biomass as renewable energy: Worldwide research trends,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11030863.
[8] G. V. Ochoa, J. N. Alvarez, and C. Acevedo, “Research evolution on renewable energies resources from 2007 to 2017: A comparative study on solar, geothermal, wind and biomass energy,” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 242–253, 2019, doi: 10.32479/ijeep.8051.
[9] Z. Zhang, G. Hu, X. Mu, and L. Kong, “From low carbon to carbon neutrality: A bibliometric analysis of the status, evolution and development trend,” J Environ Manage, vol. 322, no. 15, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116087.
[10] S. M. Thomas, “The evaluation of plant biomass research: a case study of the problems inherent in bibliometric indicators,” Scientometrics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 149–167, 1992.
[11] L. Wang, S. Wang, J. Zhou, L. Xie, H. Qin, and H. Ma, “A Scientometric Review: Biomass Gasification Study from 2006 to 2020,” ACS Omega, vol. 7, no. 43, pp. 38246–38253, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05527.
[12] F. M. Geovanni Ferrari, Andrea Pezzuolo, Abdul-Sattar Nizami, “Bibliometric analysis of trends in biomass for bioenergy reserach,” Energies (Basel), 2020.
[13] A. Knapczyk, S. Francik, M. Jewiarz, A. Zawi, and R. Francik, “Thermal treatment of biomass : a bibliometric analysis — the torrefaction case,” pp. 1–31, 2021.
[14] A. Helal, N. Anderson, Y. Wei, and M. Thompson, “A Review of Biomass-to-Bioenergy Supply Chain Research Using Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization,” Energies (Basel), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2023.
[15] S. G. Azevedo, M. Santos, and J. R. Antón, “Supply chain of renewable energy: A bibliometric review approach,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 126, no. April, pp. 70–83, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.022.
[16] A. Rosokhata, M. Minchenko, L. Khomenko, and O. Chygryn, “Renewable energy: A bibliometric analysis,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 250, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202125003002.
[17] R. Yuan et al., “Research Priorities and Trends on Bioenergy: Insights from Bibliometric Analysis,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315881.
[18] H. Du, N. Li, M. A. Brown, Y. Peng, and Y. Shuai, “A bibliographic analysis of recent solar energy literatures: The expansion and evolution of a research field,” Renew Energy, vol. 66, pp. 696–706, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.018.
[19] H. B. Adedayo, S. A. Adio, and B. O. Oboirien, “Energy research in Nigeria: A bibliometric analysis,” Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 34, no. March, p. 100629, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100629.
[20] S. Singh, K. Singh, J. Ahmed, V. M. Soni, and N. Munjal, “Research and Development of Biomass Production in India: A Bibliometric Study,” in Advances in Functional and Smart Materials, C. Prakash, S. Singh, and G. Krolczyk, Eds. Springer Singapore, 2023, pp. 161–173. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-4147-4_17.
[21] M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M. Á. Martínez, J. A. Moral-Munoz, E. Herrera-Viedma, and M. J. Cobo, “Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1275–1287, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y.
[22] Scopus, “https://www.scopus.com/,” Elsevier.diakses pada tanggal 9 Januari 2023
[23] K. McDonald, “Physicist Proposes New Way to Rank Scientific Output,” PhysOrg, 2005. https://phys.org/news/2005-11-physicist-scientific-output.html (accessed Jan. 24, 2023).
[24] I. Pradnyaswari, J. N. Pongrekun, P. Ridhana, and I. Budiman, “Barriers and Opportunities of Bio pellets Fuel Development in Indonesia: Market Demand and Policy,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 997, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/997/1/012003.
[25] D. R. Meilanova, “IEEFA : PLN Perlu Waspadai Risiko Implementasi Cofiring Biomassa,” Binis.Com, Jakarta, 2021.
[26] R. Sisolak, “Electroplating Important in Manufacturing Cofired Multilayer Ceramic Modules and Packages.,” 1983.
[27] C. Greenfield, C. F. Alvarez, and S. Lorenczik, “Coal-Fired Electricity,” 2022.
[28] International Energy Agency, “Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector,” 2021.
[29] GVR, “Coal Power Generation Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Technology (Pulverized, Cyclone Furnaces), By Application (Residential, Commercial & Industrial), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2020 - 2028,” 2020.
[30] Straits Research, “Biomass Power Market: Information by Technology, Feedstock, and Region - Forecast till 2030,” 2021.
[2] P. Križan et al., “Briquetting of municipal solid waste by different technologies in order to evaluate its quality and properties,” Agronomy Research, vol. 9, no. SPPL. ISS. 1, pp. 115–123, 2011.
[3] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J Bus Res, vol. 133, no. March, pp. 285–296, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
[4] H. Chen and Y. S. Ho, “Highly cited articles in biomass research: A bibliometric analysis,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 12–20, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.060.
[5] C. Cicea, C. Marinescu, C. F. Albu, and D. P. Bălan, “Applying bibliometric mapping and clustering on research regarding biomass related innovation,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, 2019, no. April, pp. 2404–2419.
[6] A. Sertolli, Z. Gabnai, P. Lengyel, and A. Bai, “Biomass Potential and Utilization in Worldwide Research Trends—A Bibliometric Analysis,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14095515.
[7] M. A. Perea-Moreno, E. Samerón-Manzano, and A. J. Perea-Moreno, “Biomass as renewable energy: Worldwide research trends,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11030863.
[8] G. V. Ochoa, J. N. Alvarez, and C. Acevedo, “Research evolution on renewable energies resources from 2007 to 2017: A comparative study on solar, geothermal, wind and biomass energy,” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 242–253, 2019, doi: 10.32479/ijeep.8051.
[9] Z. Zhang, G. Hu, X. Mu, and L. Kong, “From low carbon to carbon neutrality: A bibliometric analysis of the status, evolution and development trend,” J Environ Manage, vol. 322, no. 15, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116087.
[10] S. M. Thomas, “The evaluation of plant biomass research: a case study of the problems inherent in bibliometric indicators,” Scientometrics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 149–167, 1992.
[11] L. Wang, S. Wang, J. Zhou, L. Xie, H. Qin, and H. Ma, “A Scientometric Review: Biomass Gasification Study from 2006 to 2020,” ACS Omega, vol. 7, no. 43, pp. 38246–38253, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05527.
[12] F. M. Geovanni Ferrari, Andrea Pezzuolo, Abdul-Sattar Nizami, “Bibliometric analysis of trends in biomass for bioenergy reserach,” Energies (Basel), 2020.
[13] A. Knapczyk, S. Francik, M. Jewiarz, A. Zawi, and R. Francik, “Thermal treatment of biomass : a bibliometric analysis — the torrefaction case,” pp. 1–31, 2021.
[14] A. Helal, N. Anderson, Y. Wei, and M. Thompson, “A Review of Biomass-to-Bioenergy Supply Chain Research Using Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization,” Energies (Basel), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2023.
[15] S. G. Azevedo, M. Santos, and J. R. Antón, “Supply chain of renewable energy: A bibliometric review approach,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 126, no. April, pp. 70–83, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.022.
[16] A. Rosokhata, M. Minchenko, L. Khomenko, and O. Chygryn, “Renewable energy: A bibliometric analysis,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 250, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202125003002.
[17] R. Yuan et al., “Research Priorities and Trends on Bioenergy: Insights from Bibliometric Analysis,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315881.
[18] H. Du, N. Li, M. A. Brown, Y. Peng, and Y. Shuai, “A bibliographic analysis of recent solar energy literatures: The expansion and evolution of a research field,” Renew Energy, vol. 66, pp. 696–706, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.018.
[19] H. B. Adedayo, S. A. Adio, and B. O. Oboirien, “Energy research in Nigeria: A bibliometric analysis,” Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 34, no. March, p. 100629, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100629.
[20] S. Singh, K. Singh, J. Ahmed, V. M. Soni, and N. Munjal, “Research and Development of Biomass Production in India: A Bibliometric Study,” in Advances in Functional and Smart Materials, C. Prakash, S. Singh, and G. Krolczyk, Eds. Springer Singapore, 2023, pp. 161–173. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-4147-4_17.
[21] M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M. Á. Martínez, J. A. Moral-Munoz, E. Herrera-Viedma, and M. J. Cobo, “Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1275–1287, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y.
[22] Scopus, “https://www.scopus.com/,” Elsevier.diakses pada tanggal 9 Januari 2023
[23] K. McDonald, “Physicist Proposes New Way to Rank Scientific Output,” PhysOrg, 2005. https://phys.org/news/2005-11-physicist-scientific-output.html (accessed Jan. 24, 2023).
[24] I. Pradnyaswari, J. N. Pongrekun, P. Ridhana, and I. Budiman, “Barriers and Opportunities of Bio pellets Fuel Development in Indonesia: Market Demand and Policy,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 997, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/997/1/012003.
[25] D. R. Meilanova, “IEEFA : PLN Perlu Waspadai Risiko Implementasi Cofiring Biomassa,” Binis.Com, Jakarta, 2021.
[26] R. Sisolak, “Electroplating Important in Manufacturing Cofired Multilayer Ceramic Modules and Packages.,” 1983.
[27] C. Greenfield, C. F. Alvarez, and S. Lorenczik, “Coal-Fired Electricity,” 2022.
[28] International Energy Agency, “Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector,” 2021.
[29] GVR, “Coal Power Generation Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Technology (Pulverized, Cyclone Furnaces), By Application (Residential, Commercial & Industrial), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2020 - 2028,” 2020.
[30] Straits Research, “Biomass Power Market: Information by Technology, Feedstock, and Region - Forecast till 2030,” 2021.